The effectiveness of money as a motivation for academic institutions. An assessment

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COPYRIGHT

DEDICATION

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

ABSTRACT

LIST OF TABLES

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF ACRONYMS

CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction of the Study
1.2 Background of the problem
1.3 Statement of the problem
1.4 General objective of the study
1.5 Specific objectives of the study
1.6 Research questions
1.7 Significance of the study
1.8 The scope of the study
1.9 The limitations of the study
1.10 The theoretical framework

CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Theoretical literature review
2.2 The concept and meaning of motivation
2.3 The key elements of motivation
2.4 The type and nature of motivation
2.5 Work-Motivation theories,
2.6 The empirical literature review

CHAPTER THREE
3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research design
3.2 Area of the study
3.3 Population of the study
3.4 Sampling procedures and sample size
1. Sampling procedures
2. Sample size
3.5 Data source
3.6 Data collection methods
3.7 Instrumentation
3.8 Data analysis
3.9 Limitations and delimitations
3.10 Time frame
3.11 Budget

CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
4.1 Data analysis and presentation
4.2 Introduction
4.3 Profile of Respondents
4.4 Respondent’s Level of intrinsic motivation toward the job
4.5 Assessing Academic staff’s demotivators at TUDARCo
4.6 Academic staff’s motivation packages at TUDARCo
4.7 Assessing the Effectiveness of Employee motivators
4.8 Money and Motivation
4.9 Effectiveness of money as motivator
4.10 Discussion of findings
4.11 The main causes of demotivation for academic staff at TUDARCo?
4.12 The common motivation packages offered to academic staff at TUDARCo
4.13 Effectiveness of extrinsic motivators compared to intrinsic motivators
4.14 Employees’ perception in regard to money and motivation
4.15 Effectiveness of money in motivation compared to other motivators

CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 CONCLUNSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Summary of the study
5.2 General Conclusions
5.3 Recommendations
5.4 Limitations of this study and recommendations for future studies

REFERENCES

APPENDICES
Appendix I: Academic staff’s questionnaire
Appendix II: Management interview questions