Excerpt
Contents
List of Abbreviations
Introduction
Thesis, Aims and Outline
Part I: Contextualisation of the Microsoft Judgment
Chapter 1 – The Theory and Practice of the Controversial Interface Between IPRs and Competition Law, and the Exercise of Tying
1.1. IPRs and Competition Law in Legal Theory
1.2. IPRs and Competition Law in Legal Practice
1.3. The Exercise of Tying in Theory and Practice
Part II: The Controversial and Contestable Conclusions of the Microsoft Judgment
Chapter 2 – A Dramatic Attenuation of the Exceptional Circumstances Criteria
2.1. The Indispensability Criterion
2.2. The Elimination of Competition Criterion
2.3. The New Product Criterion
2.4. Chapter Conclusions and Implications
Chapter 3 – The Application of a Flawed and Inappropriate Form-Based Tying Test
3.1. The Separate Products Element
3.2. The Foreclosure Element
3.2. The Choice/Coercion Element
3.4. The Objective Justification Element
3.5. Chapter Conclusions and Implications
Conclusion
Appendix – Correspondence with Mr Forrester, QC
Bibliography
- Quote paper
- Veronica Hagenfeldt (Author), 2009, The Contestable and Potentially Harmful Conclusions of the 'Microsoft' Case, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/169615
Publish now - it's free
Comments